[pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or similar) wg?
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 05 February 2016 11:56 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E81B3755 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ho4JzGAUhQgr for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF7C1B3750 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D72BBE3F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:56:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4dkafYrbGSt for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:56:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7895BDCC for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:56:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1454673391; bh=9SrVgC2NEK3ifEqpJ+ugZg/uwSVAC9bN6gHHH+esZlU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=TqV7Es5g6yfLv+abcMgpKbjIpMcNozekIsmZqMjJl/1C0H9EH8PEbWaGQpKlBLh02 96WXEiEBE3dIUraNolzTek5EF4tH3mUHbsiyqCAPXQXizRslRdDAu/zpM+5xTAp+Fg ktkFwfto3ZoZTIm2FwTl+pbnUDD5sJnrLGHeo/Bk=
To: pkix <pkix@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56B48DED.5080202@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:56:29 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/SYjftGy0a8RyUp_gQq4GpFdBW5A>
Subject: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or similar) wg?
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:56:34 -0000
Hiya, We seem to be seeing a number of drafts that folks are writing that define new certificate extensions or that want to update/modify PKIX specs. Do folks think it is now time to form a working group to process those? If no, please say why. If yes, please say what draft(s) and propose any other scoping. If you know of people who are or would implement and deploy, that is very useful information. (It is fine to say "I think we should work on topic <foo>" but it is *much* better if you can point at a draft you've written about <foo> and say that you or someone is implementing that and that it'll get deployed.) If you think this requires face to face discussion at IETF95 (e.g. to tease out scope) please say that too. We still have a couple of weeks before the BoF deadline and if a short session is needed that can be arranged. Note though that there is no need to have such a BoF session to form a WG, if everything is clear already. FWIW, my impression is that we do seem to have a handful of drafts where folks seem willing to do the work and where the work might be (or has been) implemented. So if there's enough interest, I'd be supportive of forming a (hopefully:-) short-lived, tightly scoped, WG to handle that work. Cheers, S.
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Peter Bowen
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or simil… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pkix] [saag] Fwd: Is it time for a pkix exte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Eliot Lear
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Is it time for a pkix extensions (or s… Wei Chuang
- [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: Is i… David A. Cooper
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Eliot Lear
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … David A. Cooper
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Eliot Lear
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … David A. Cooper
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Miller, Timothy J.
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … David A. Cooper
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Peter Bowen
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … David A. Cooper
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Eliot Lear
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Tom Gindin
- [pkix] MUD Draft - was Re: [saag] Fwd: Is it time… Tom Gindin
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Russ Housley
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Tom Gindin
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules (was Re: … Wei Chuang
- Re: [pkix] Email address matching rules, this is … John R Levine