IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragment identifiers, was: Fwd: FW: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-file-scheme-13.txt

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 13 January 2015 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004FC1A8A6A; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mzgd-l_faKFc; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0434E1ACD55; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.15]) by scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F9832E0BC; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:59:49 +0900 (JST)
Received: from itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 399c_44ab_770ab094_6516_4d3f_8131_3823dd7fe476; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:59:49 +0900
Received: from [133.2.210.64] (unknown [133.2.210.64]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA07FBF4DE; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:59:48 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <54B4DE84.4000102@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:59:48 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
References: <54B1B682.3070609@intertwingly.net> <54B28E0F.8070306@gmx.de> <54B2936B.7030805@intertwingly.net> <05AD7DE2-1C54-45CD-B33A-13766D771E57@mnot.net> <54B2A2CD.5080502@gmx.de> <1A5BBD25-FEBD-49B1-9EFB-4EF8877BF0E7@mnot.net> <54B2A4F9.2070909@gmx.de> <54B2A894.4020201@intertwingly.net> <54B2F4C3.5020008@seantek.com> <54B3940A.6020308@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20150112181536.GN16323@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20150112181536.GN16323@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/Ul-NiFbokwEZRHxm6qNC-G869yg>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>, "pkix@ietf.org" <pkix@ietf.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [apps-discuss] character repertoire for fragment identifiers, was: Fwd: FW: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-file-scheme-13.txt
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:00:39 -0000

On 2015/01/13 03:15, Nico Williams wrote:

> The href attribute in HTML is one thing.  "_All_ URI/IRI slots" is
> another.
>
> I don't object to versioning protocols and data formats to change
> specific URI slots into IRI slots.
>
> Thus I have no objection to -say- the href attribute in HTML being made
> into an IRI slot (with or without versioning of HTML -- that being an
> issue for W3C, though if it were the IETF we'd want to do something
> better than a flag day).

There was no flag day for HTML. IRIs didn't exist (neither the spec nor 
the name) when HTML 4.0 became a Recommendation in 1997 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40-971218/). But there's implementation 
advice in that spec at 
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40-971218/appendix/notes.html#h-B.2.1 that 
amounts to essentially the same conversion as the one from IRIs to URIs 
defined later in RFC 3987. Browsers took up that hint sooner or later.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email