Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-pkalgs-04.txt

Hans Schupp <schupp@secude.com> Thu, 18 October 2001 17:32 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16170 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:32:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f9IGhPV22027 for ietf-pkix-bks; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway.secude.com (linux.secude.com [141.12.207.27]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f9IGhND22013 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remus.secude.com (remus.intranet.secude.com [192.168.2.2]) by gateway.secude.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7793E8E29; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:42:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from secude.com (vpn-dolivo.intranet.secude.com [192.168.1.7]) by remus.secude.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 4VZ2WGWW; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:50:25 +0200
Message-ID: <3BCF0705.A9BDE09B@secude.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:44:53 +0200
From: Hans Schupp <schupp@secude.com>
Organization: SECUDE GmbH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lbassham@nist.gov, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, tim.polk@nist.gov
Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org, lauer@secude.com
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-pkalgs-04.txt
References: <200110161108.HAA09145@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:

>         Author(s)       : L. Bassham, R. Housley, W. Polk
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-pkalgs-04.txt

There is an inconsistency in the declaration of
id-characteristic-two-basis. In the text it is declared as {
characteristic-two-field basisType(1) } (on page 16) while in the ASN.1
Module it says { characteristic-two-field basisType(3) }.

IMHO the latter one is correct (according to X9.62).
Can you please clarify and correct the draft?

regards, Hans Schupp