[pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5480 (6670)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 01 September 2021 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC53A0CC5; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey3gJ0pWRY4H; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C524C3A0CC3; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 32189F4073B; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: corey.bonnell@digicert.com, turners@ieca.com, kelviny@microsoft.com, dbrown@certicom.com, housley@vigilsec.com, wpolk@nist.gov
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: kaduk@mit.edu, iesg@ietf.org, pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210901164242.32189F4073B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:42:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/VFa3TobMzv3Dlu0csAKQALi8IU8>
Subject: [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5480 (6670)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:43:10 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5480, "Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6670 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Corey Bonnell <corey.bonnell@digicert.com> Date Reported: 2021-08-31 Verified by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- If the keyUsage extension is present in a certificate that indicates id-ecDH or id-ecMQV in SubjectPublicKeyInfo, then the following values MUST NOT be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyTransport; keyCertSign; and cRLSign. Corrected Text -------------- If the keyUsage extension is present in a certificate that indicates id-ecDH or id-ecMQV in SubjectPublicKeyInfo, then the following values MUST NOT be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyEncipherment; keyCertSign; and cRLSign. Notes ----- "keyTransport" KU bit name does not exist; I believe "keyEncipherment" is intended here instead. While RFC 8813 makes it clear that "keyEncipherment" and "dataEncipherment" are prohibited, I'm marking this erratum as "Technical" due the reference to a non-existent bit name. -------------------------------------- RFC5480 (draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information Publication Date : March 2009 Author(s) : S. Turner, D. Brown, K. Yiu, R. Housley, T. Polk Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC5480 (6670) RFC Errata System