[pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC4210 (5201)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 04 February 2022 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0693A1E00; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFfQozcZl0pU; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F0B3A1DFE; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 2203B15FF77; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:17:37 -0800 (PST)
To: simon.edaenge@outlook.com, cadams@site.uottawa.ca, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, toka@ssh.com, tmononen@safenet-inc.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, pkix@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220204181737.2203B15FF77@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 10:17:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/WSYZ8XzLh03susEMmYcg9bihrIc>
Subject: [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC4210 (5201)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 18:17:49 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC4210, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5201 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Simon Edänge <simon.edaenge@outlook.com> Date Reported: 2017-12-12 Verified by: Roman Danyliw (IESG) Section: Appendix D.4 Original Text ------------- Initialization Response -- ip Field Value sender CA name -- the name of the CA who produced the message messageTime present -- time at which CA produced message protectionAlg MS_MAC_ALG -- only MAC protection is allowed for this response Corrected Text -------------- Initialization Response -- ip Field Value sender CA name -- the name of the CA who produced the message messageTime present -- time at which CA produced message protectionAlg MSG_MAC_ALG -- only MAC protection is allowed for this response Notes ----- There is a typo in Appendix D.4 -- "MS_MAC_ALG" should be "MSG_MAC_ALG" -------------------------------------- RFC4210 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Publication Date : September 2005 Author(s) : C. Adams, S. Farrell, T. Kause, T. Mononen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC4210 (5201) RFC Errata System