Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7549)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 23 June 2023 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79319C19E115 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxoE4uIEVlCH for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36E5C1881C4 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7211B1740BF; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:35:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48AF2174019; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:35:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230623070200.EBDC610D6B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:34:53 -0400
Cc: toka@ssh.com, rufus.buschart@siemens.com, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>, Carlisle Adams <cadams@site.uottawa.ca>, tmononen@safenet-inc.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <552AFD48-61DD-4C38-96DE-3827BD556695@vigilsec.com>
References: <20230623070200.EBDC610D6B@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/dFmK6Qc0rQu1BrNjWtrFdRIPkak>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7549)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:35:09 -0000

This looks correct to me.  I think it should be approved.

Russ

> On Jun 23, 2023, at 3:02 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4210,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7549
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Rufus Buschart <rufus.buschart@siemens.com>
> 
> Section: 3.1.2. point 11
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> correct RA of CA public key
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> correct RA or CA public key
> 
> Notes
> -----
>> From the context it is obvious that there is a typo in the original text. This claim is supported by the fact that the "r" and the "f" key are next to each other on the keyboard.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4210 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
> Publication Date    : September 2005
> Author(s)           : C. Adams, S. Farrell, T. Kause, T. Mononen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix