Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (3943)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 02 April 2014 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE15B1A041D for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUiHAUL1cCZW for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628E61A040F for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4B5BE38; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 00:03:37 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUJfg-kjNjvq; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 00:03:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.42.19.227]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25DBDBE33; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 00:03:36 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <533C9747.5090502@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:03:35 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, jimsch@augustcellars.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
References: <20140402181632.8ECF57FC3A9@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140402181632.8ECF57FC3A9@rfc-editor.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/g07icnoW2sqbagmm1bDM-0IjVIQ
Cc: pkix@ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (3943)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 23:03:48 -0000

A bug fix that breaks interop?  Is that a valid Erratum?

S

On 04/02/2014 07:16 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6402,
> "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6402&eid=3943
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
> 
> Section: 2.8,
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
>       ChangeSubjectName ::= SEQUENCE {
>           subject             Name OPTIONAL,
>           subjectAlt          SubjectAltName OPTIONAL
>       }
>       (WITH COMPONENTS {..., subject PRESENT} |
>             COMPONENTS {..., subjectAlt PRESENT} )
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       ChangeSubjectName ::= SEQUENCE {
>           subject             Name OPTIONAL,
>           subjectAlt          [1] SubjectAltName OPTIONAL
>       }
>       (WITH COMPONENTS {..., subject PRESENT} |
>             COMPONENTS {..., subjectAlt PRESENT} )
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Both Name and SubjectAltName use the same tag (SEQUENCE) so it is not possible to distinguish between the two fields without having a tag on one of them.  This fix adds a tag so that it is possible to differentiate the two fields.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates
> Publication Date    : November 2011
> Author(s)           : J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
>