Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4797)
Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Tue, 13 September 2016 22:29 UTC
Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F417912B0AC for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-Zr-25VZKUd for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FAC12B0CD for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A781E5A0B; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHhYmI2Jd415; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (cpe-76-174-176-44.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.176.44]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9E6C1E5A07; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANNx7D_NPPYOekz4yOv7N-dE9Fa5VBkWKay2ADNQdS91YwP=GA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:29:37 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9BA9F51-76DC-4B6D-88A7-684B50A942A7@amsl.com>
References: <20160908140059.7EF20B80BD6@rfc-editor.org> <CANNx7D_NPPYOekz4yOv7N-dE9Fa5VBkWKay2ADNQdS91YwP=GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lijun Liao <lijun.liao@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/m-phZqhY_R4vqR56jhAjhLV-2Vs>
Cc: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>, jimsch@exmsft.com, pkix@ietf.org, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4797)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:29:40 -0000
Lijun, We have edited this report to contain your correction in the Notes field as requested. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Sep 8, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Lijun Liao <lijun.liao@gmail.com> wrote: > Just correction: > > The Notes should be as follows: > ------------------------------------------ > > The original text conflicts with the following text block (just several lines later). > > " The fields of POPOSigningKey have the following meaning: > ... > > signature contains the POP value produce. If poposkInput is > present, the signature is computed over the DER-encoded value of > poposkInput. If poposkInput is absent, the signature is computed > over the DER-encoded value of certReq." > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:00 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4211, > "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4211&eid=4797 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Lijun Liao <lijun.liao@gmail.com> > > Section: 4.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > 3. The certificate subject places its name in the Certificate > Template structure along with the public key. In this case the > poposkInput field is omitted from the POPOSigningKey structure. > The signature field is computed over the DER-encoded certificate > template structure. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 3. The certificate subject places its name in the Certificate > Template structure along with the public key. In this case the > poposkInput field is omitted from the POPOSigningKey structure. > The signature field is computed over the DER-encoded value of > certReq > > Notes > ----- > The original text conflicts with the following text block (just several lines later). > > " The fields of POPOSigningKeyInput have the following meaning: > > sender contains an authenticated identity that has been previously > established for the subject. > > publicKeyMAC contains a computed value that uses a shared secret > between the CA/RA and the certificate requestor. > > publicKey contains a copy of the public key from the certificate > template. This MUST be exactly the same value as is contained in > the certificate template." > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4211 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF) > Publication Date : September 2005 > Author(s) : J. Schaad > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > > -- > Lijun Liao
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4797) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4… Lijun Liao
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4… Megan Ferguson
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4… Jim Schaad
- [pkix] [Errata Verified] RFC4211 (4797) RFC Errata System