[pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 04 May 2021 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534D53A14AE for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79tYvL4TzkqX for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976033A14B3 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A1A92F407CD; Tue, 4 May 2021 14:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: jimsch@augustcellars.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, kent@bbn.com, stefan@aaa-sec.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, pkix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210504212258.A1A92F407CD@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:22:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/m5Ji-vJxl6MuKNoLicWuzxsONeM>
Subject: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:23:32 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6402, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6571 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Section: Appendix A.1 Original Text ------------- pendInfo PendInfo, extendedFailInfo SEQUENCE { Corrected Text -------------- pendInfo PendInfo, extendedFailInfo [1] SEQUENCE { Notes ----- The ASN.1 module will not compile properly without a tag on one of these elements. The ASN.1 module in Appendix A.2 has a tag in this spot. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates Publication Date : November 2011 Author(s) : J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6… Sean Turner