Re: draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof -> RFC?
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie> Thu, 31 May 2001 10:59 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com ([208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id GAA19744 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2001 06:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA11703 for ietf-pkix-bks; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hip.baltimore.ie ([193.41.17.101]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA11691 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Baltimore-FW1 ([172.19.1.1]) by hip.baltimore.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA20224 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:18:01 +0100
Received: from Baltimore-FW1 (wilde-i-1.ie.baltimore.com) by emeairlsw1.baltimore.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T53dad5cb330a9919350ac@emeairlsw1.baltimore.com> for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:42:09 +0100
Received: from baltimore.ie (ip226-24.ie.baltimore.com [10.153.24.226]) by bobcat.baltimore.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA30029; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:45:48 +0100
Message-ID: <3B16112C.15E5BF37@baltimore.ie>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:38:52 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
Reply-To: stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Organization: Baltimore Technologies Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hideyuki Odahara <odahara@dsa.isl.ntt.co.jp>
CC: ietf-pkix@imc.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof -> RFC?
References: <20010410173741.DB73.ODAHARA@dsa.isl.ntt.co.jp> <3ADC3F64.895C47B0@baltimore.ie> <20010530104344.4868.ODAHARA@dsa.isl.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, I'm not entirely clear exactly what question is being asked, however, I *think* the answer is that I've got to make a few very minor changes and then that draft will be sent to the RFC editor. In other words, the work on this specification is done, it will be an RFC quite soon now, without any substantive changes being made. The minor changes to be made include adding a section saying that there are no IANA consideration; updating to reflect a couple of minor changes to the base X.509 document and a change to allow some s/mime specifications to reference this document more easily. I hope that answers your question, Regards, Stephen. Hideyuki Odahara wrote: > > Mr. Stephen Farrell > > Thank you for your reply the example of use of an attribute the other > day. > I would like you to teach about RFC-izing of draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof > today, and mail was given. While it is said that ac509prof has near > RFC-izing, it is not RFC-ized easily. Now, would you the argument is > progressing how much and teach [ when to RFC-be due to beized and ] this > draft? > Although humiliated a busy place, I ask of you well. > > thanks > -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
- attributes in AC Hideyuki Odahara
- Re: attributes in AC Stephen Farrell
- draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof -> RFC? Hideyuki Odahara
- Re: draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof -> RFC? Stephen Farrell
- Re: draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof -> RFC? Hideyuki Odahara