Re: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison to IETF on the removal of upper bound in X.509"

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 15 October 2007 18:45 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhUwF-0007mt-SF for pkix-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:45:15 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhUw2-0006Qg-Uf for pkix-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:45:07 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l9FHfg1a013679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:41:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l9FHfg4t013677; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:41:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from [10.1.0.77] (dsl-63-249-108-169.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l9FHfZku013650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:41:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624080cc33956827330@[10.1.0.77]>
In-Reply-To: <4713A14B.5040906@kent.ac.uk>
References: <4707E6DA.1070703@cs.tcd.ie> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C316615570536E1@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <FA998122A677CF4390C1E291BFCF59890849839E@EXCH.missi.ncsc.mil> <470BB253.3030703@cs.tcd.ie> <FA998122A677CF4390C1E291BFCF598908498416@EXCH.missi.ncsc.mil> <470C1C32.70603@eb2bcom.com> <E75F200AF1718F45B2024A88C3141A1D06437A82F3@EA-EXMSG-C320.europe.corp.micr osoft.com> <p0624082cc331ad9846db@[192.168.1.100]> <470C1FA3.40000@eb2bcom.com> <p06240801c332913ed8ad@[192.168.1.3]> <470EC778.500@eb2bcom.com> <p06240822c33533e1b00d@[192.168.1.3]> <FA998122A677CF4390C1E291BFCF5989085414FA@EXCH.missi.ncsc.mil> <4713A14B.5040906@kent.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:41:31 -0700
To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison to IETF on the removal of upper bound in X.509"
Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007

At 6:20 PM +0100 10/15/07, David Chadwick wrote:
>It is written at the start of Annex C of X.521, as copied below
>
>>Annex C
>>
>>Upper bounds
>>(This annex does not form an integral part of this Recommendation | 
>>International Standard)
>>This annex includes all of the suggested upper bound value 
>>constraints used in these Directory Specifications, in the form of 
>>the ASN.1 module UpperBounds.
>>
>>UpperBounds {joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1) upperBounds(10) 5}
>>DEFINITIONS ::=
>>BEGIN

Could you show the whole Annex? That is, could we see all the upper 
bounds listed? Or, is there just a blank line and "END"? :-)


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium