Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3279 (7296)
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 03 January 2023 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0557AC1522C1 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 07:48:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4q0Sa8zTFZ7 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49B6C1522B0 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4916C15D04E; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:48:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-56-234-133.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.56.234.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A1A315D18C; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:48:28 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230103085835.A91E39609A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 10:48:27 -0500
Cc: drillgon200@gmail.com, lbassham@nist.gov, IETF PKIX <pkix@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3C32097-1036-4D9C-AB55-632FB8620D12@vigilsec.com>
References: <20230103085835.A91E39609A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/tdF6oQlMNfOkIfD1ChGiPD6MzSE>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3279 (7296)
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pkix/>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 15:48:34 -0000
The correction seems proper. I suggest that "held for update" is the best state. Russ > On Jan 3, 2023, at 3:58 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3279, > "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7296 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Evan Pottier <drillgon200@gmail.com> > > Section: 2.3.5 > > Original Text > ------------- > When the parameters are inherited, the parameters field SHALL contain > implictlyCA, which is the ASN.1 value NULL. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > When the parameters are inherited, the parameters field SHALL contain > implicitlyCA, which is the ASN.1 value NULL. > > Notes > ----- > "implictly" appears to be missing an i. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3279 (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-pkalgs-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile > Publication Date : April 2002 > Author(s) : L. Bassham, W. Polk, R. Housley > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > pkix@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
- [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3279 (7296) RFC Errata System
- Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3279 (7… Russ Housley