IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Review for draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Sat, 28 May 2005 21:16 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04386 for <pkix-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4SKcGD2082132; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j4SKcGPF082131; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (STRATTON-THREE-SIXTY-NINE.MIT.EDU [18.187.6.114]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4SKcFrV082123 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hartmans@mit.edu)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 87EBDE0063; Sat, 28 May 2005 16:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: timmoore@microsoft.com, ietf-pkix@imc.org
Subject: Re: AD Review for draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis
References: <tsl3bsdin0y.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <6.2.1.2.2.20050524104606.03fab960@mail.binhost.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 16:38:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050524104606.03fab960@mail.binhost.com> (Russ Housley's message of "Tue, 24 May 2005 11:35:10 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslekbr2iiy.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Hi, Russ.  These changes look good to me and I agree they address my
comments.

There doesn't seem to be any disagreement from the WG, so let's send
in a new draft unless we get an objection from the chairs.  I believe
I'm still waiting for a proto writeup from Tim.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email