Re: [pkix] Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-05: (with COMMENT)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 17/03/16 08:57, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-05: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Elwyn's Gen-ART review brought up a downref issue which Stephen suggest
> we handle as follows:
> 
>> 2985 is a normative reference in 5750 which is standards track
>> so I think we can safely claim precedent and I can put 2985 in the
>> downref registry if nobody objects.
> 
> Which I think is fine.

Thanks for the reminder, I've added a note-to-self to do that:-)

S.


> 
>