[pkng] Possible research areas for pkng

"Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov> Thu, 12 November 2009 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <william.polk@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AADE3A6919 for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:01:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h13SyuuXobWc for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp2.nist.gov [129.6.16.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6549C3A6853 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (wsxghub1.nist.gov [129.6.18.96]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAC71nPM011645 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:01:49 -0500
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov ([2002:8106:1260::8106:1260]) with mapi; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:01:48 -0500
From: "Polk, William T." <william.polk@nist.gov>
To: "pkng@irtf.org" <pkng@irtf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:01:42 -0500
Thread-Topic: Possible research areas for pkng
Thread-Index: AQHKY2RBcEUlqwVW+Ei15llT4Szd5A==
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49307898F9041@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NIST-MailScanner-From: william.polk@nist.gov
Subject: [pkng] Possible research areas for pkng
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:01:29 -0000

Folks,

While I am not losing any sleep over quantum computing, success in this technology area would be a real game changer for PKI.  There is a set of algorithms that are plausibly quantum resistant, but they are generally unsuitable for X.509 style PKI.  Keys are huge with one algorithm, and can only be used to generate limited numbers of signatures with another.  I would be very interested in any work that explored alternative infrastructures better suited to these algorithms.  It behooves us to be ready...

Tim Polk