Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 25 January 2010 14:25 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9553A68D7 for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:25:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vayoStj7z0jX for <pkng@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:25:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E7E3A6838 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-228-193.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.228.193]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A0F040329 for <pkng@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:25:18 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B5DA9BD.6040501@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:25:01 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pkng@irtf.org
References: <4B5D5A53.8080804@sunet.se> <4B5D987D.3070309@stpeter.im> <4B5DA3A2.50908@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <4B5DA3A2.50908@sunet.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms030306050905050409040607"
Subject: Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far?
X-BeenThere: pkng@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Public Key Next Generation \(PKNG\) Research Group" <pkng.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/pkng>
List-Post: <mailto:pkng@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkng>, <mailto:pkng-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:25:15 -0000
On 1/25/10 6:58 AM, Leif Johansson wrote: > On 01/25/2010 02:11 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 1/25/10 1:46 AM, Leif Johansson wrote: >>> >>> I've been asked to give a presentation about pkng at the Terena tf-emc2 >>> "Middleware Choir" in Wienna. >>> http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-emc2/meetings/15/. >>> >>> This isn't a very visible meeting but I'd still like to ask if anyone >>> feels strongly about somebody (me) giving a summary of the discussions >>> so far. >> >> I don't know how much discussion there is to summarize. :) But I'd be >> curious to hear your perspective and see your slides. > > > I was thinking about making some slides based on everyones wishlists > actually. There is some interesting stuff there. That sounds helpful, and might help us restart the conversation. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Leif Johansson
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Leif Johansson
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [pkng] ok to summarize our discussions so far? Melinda Shore