IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [PMOL] Draft Charter for discussion

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Fri, 21 September 2007 21:35 UTC

Return-path: <pmol-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYq9R-0004J7-MG; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:35:05 -0400
Received: from pmol by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IYq9R-0004Iz-Fi for pmol-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:35:05 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYq9Q-0004G0-J7 for pmol@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:35:04 -0400
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com ([216.82.241.195]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYq9P-0003Dw-Jv for pmol@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:35:03 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1190410501!16104755!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.149]
Received: (qmail 21958 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 21:35:02 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.149) by server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 21:35:02 -0000
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8LLZ1sT004462 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:35:01 -0700
Received: from flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (flph023.ffdc.sbc.com [150.234.117.36]) by flph024.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8LLYume004414 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:34:56 -0700
Received: from ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8LLYuUt002544 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:34:56 -0700
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by flph023.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8LLYsFo002519 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:34:54 -0700
Message-Id: <200709212134.l8LLYsFo002519@flph023.ffdc.sbc.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (unknown[135.210.76.249](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20070921213452gw10010gi0e>; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:34:53 +0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:34:24 -0400
To: Loki Jorgenson <ljorgenson@apparentnetworks.com>, pmol@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Subject: RE: [PMOL] Draft Charter for discussion
In-Reply-To: <F09324DCDD2F5D488EAC603D6B299DC704088348@jsrvr8.jaalam.net >
References: <200709211324.l8LDOG7M031034@flph023.ffdc.sbc.com> <F09324DCDD2F5D488EAC603D6B299DC704088348@jsrvr8.jaalam.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics at Other Layers <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pmol-bounces@ietf.org

Loki,

At 04:49 PM 9/21/2007, Loki Jorgenson wrote:
>...What would seem missing from the draft charter is a reference to some
>sort of framework (instead of the implicit "set of L3 and higher network
>protocols") that bridges metrics and performance with at least "types of
>applications". ...

I avoided an explicit framework because the intent is that this WG
be able to work on performance metric proposals both above
and below IP (if it continues beyond this initial charter).

For example, the latest version of  draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-
is a proposal on control plane performance below IP.
PMOL might be looking at that in a year or so, if it's successful.

In one sentence, this WG might cover vetted work that the other
charters don't, but perhaps that's too broad and blunt.

Al



_______________________________________________
PMOL mailing list
PMOL@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email