IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 12 September 2012 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pmol@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A885B21F8669 for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.682
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.916, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JPHuP7c-JRv9 for <pmol@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8D921F862B for <pmol@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CGF7x7004060; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.93] (ams-bclaise-89112.cisco.com [10.60.67.93]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CGF6TB002753; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:15:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5050B50A.4050108@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:15:06 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <5050B187.9020307@cisco.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04081297A7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04081297A7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020409090504000905090802"
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, pmol@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate list <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:15:16 -0000

Good news already!

Regards, Benoit.
>
> FWIW -- I am shepherding the first document as XRBLOCK WG chair, and 
> Al Morton who is an active contributor in the XRBLOCK WG has carefully 
> reviewed it (I believe).
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*pmol-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pmol-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Benoit Claise
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:00 PM
> *To:* pmol@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Ron Bonica; Gonzalo Camarillo; Robert Sparks
> *Subject:* [PMOL] Review of two performance related documents
>
> Hi Directorate,
>
> I wonder if the PMOL has to say something regarding these two drafts, 
> which are on the IESG telechat tomorrow.
> Very sorry about this late notice:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-05
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch/
>
> Do you believe that PMOL directorate should really review these two?
> There is always the possibility to defer the two drafts, even if it's 
> not ideal
>
> Note: I will review the drafts now.
>
>
> Regards, Benoit.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email