IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PMOL] Draft Agenda for PMOL at IETF-70

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 21 November 2007 09:39 UTC

Return-path: <pmol-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ium3g-00025h-MG; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:39:48 -0500
Received: from pmol by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ium3f-00025c-F0 for pmol-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:39:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ium3a-00021R-2Z for pmol@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:39:42 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ium3U-0006Rd-GG for pmol@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:39:42 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id lAL9dHUu007347; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:20 +0200
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:16 +0200
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:15 +0200
Received: from esdhcp03514.research.nokia.com (esdhcp03514.research.nokia.com [172.21.35.14]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id lAL9d10l021789; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:04 +0200
Message-Id: <2AFC89C9-C28D-4430-AB2C-D79490AA3CD6@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: ext KIKUCHI Yutaka <yu@kikuken.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071121.052648.15829104.yu@kikuken.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: [PMOL] Draft Agenda for PMOL at IETF-70
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:02 +0200
References: <200711201738.lAKHcPVF000715@flph023.ffdc.sbc.com> <20071121.052648.15829104.yu@kikuken.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2007 09:39:15.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[61A45910:01C82C22]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: zin@jaist.ac.jp, ogashiwa@noware.co.jp, rbonica@juniper.net, satoru@ft.solteria.net, pmol@ietf.org, nagami@inetcore.com
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics at Other Layers <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pmol-bounces@ietf.org

On 2007-11-20, at 22:26, ext KIKUCHI Yutaka wrote:
> May I have a slot to discuss an I-D for tunnel measurement?
>
> 4. One-way Passive Measurement of End-to-End Quality (Yutaka)
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kikuchi-passive-measure-01.txt
>
> I had presented the -00 version in OPSAWG at the last IETF,
> but it is more adapted to discuss in PMOL than in OPSAWG.

Given that tunnels can be a part of an IP path, I'd think that this  
draft would be in scope of IPPM, rather than PMOL or OPSAWG. Even more  
so, because some of the metrics you define for a tunnel seem to  
overlap with metrics IPPM has already defined for IP paths.

Lars


_______________________________________________
PMOL mailing list
PMOL@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email