Re: [pmtud] pmtud charter milestone update, MIB

I think this will be fine.

I have some worries about how the MIB might go awry, but I don't think the
choice of WG will affect the outcome.

Thanks,
--MM--
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Lars Eggert wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On May 26, 2006, at 18:28, Matthew J Zekauskas wrote:
> >
> > I believe the idea was to redo the charter with the MIB in it, but
> > move it to TSVWG if that made more sense after the personal submission
> > made it out.
>
> I'd prefer to do the MIB in TSVWG, similar to how the TCP estats MIB
> happens there (and not in TCPM), because if anywhere in TSV, MIB
> people can be found in TSVWG.
>
> > Proposed:
> > Done            Reorganized Internet-Draft. Solicit implementation and
> > field experience.
> > Done            Update Internet-Draft incorporating implementers
> > experience,
> > Jun 2006        Submit completed Internet-draft of the pmtud method
> > for
> > Proposed Standard.
>
> *If* the MIB moves to TSVWG, there may not even be a need to
> recharter, because PMTUD would close at that point.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
> --
> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
pmtud@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud