Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money
Chris Shenton <cshenton@apollo.hq.nasa.gov> Wed, 26 July 1995 17:37 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12845; 26 Jul 95 13:37 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12836; 26 Jul 95 13:37 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16779; 26 Jul 95 13:37 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12816; 26 Jul 95 13:37 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12774; 26 Jul 95 13:35 EDT
Received: from apollo.hq.nasa.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16663; 26 Jul 95 13:35 EDT
Received: from wirehead.hq.nasa.gov (wirehead.hq.nasa.gov [131.182.121.88]) by apollo.hq.nasa.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA07012; Wed, 26 Jul 1995 17:37:22 GMT
Received: from localhost (cshenton@localhost) by wirehead.hq.nasa.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA16136; Wed, 26 Jul 1995 17:37:21 GMT
Message-Id: <199507261737.RAA16136@wirehead.hq.nasa.gov>
X-Authentication-Warning: wirehead.hq.nasa.gov: cshenton owned process doing -bs
X-Authentication-Warning: wirehead.hq.nasa.gov: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
cc: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>, isoc trustees <isoc-trustees@linus.isoc.org>, ISOC Advisory Council <ISOC-Advisory-Council@linus.isoc.org>, ietf <ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, poised@tis.com
Subject: Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jul 1995 09:48:28 EDT." <Pine.SUN.3.91.950726093701.20421B-100000@cybercash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <16132.806780240.1@wirehead.hq.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 13:37:20 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Chris Shenton <cshenton@apollo.hq.nasa.gov>
On Wed, 26 Jul 1995 09:48:28 -0400 (EDT), "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com> said: Donald> This is the wrong place for the charge. I'd be happy to go Donald> back to paying $70 a year for my ISOC membership rather than Donald> imposing a copying fee on RFCs. Ditto. I'd be much happier to pay more to ensure that I could get access, and more importantly, that *others* could have unrestricted access -- whether or not they pay ISOC dues. If I enable someone else to read specs, and they implement something I use in the future, I win.
- R. e: ITU document server now costs money Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Karl Auerbach
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Theodore Ts'o
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Chris Shenton
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Perry E. Metzger
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money Karl Auerbach
- R. e: ITU document server now costs money Dave Crocker
- Re: R. e: ITU document server now costs money John Day