RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16 .txt]
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 22 April 2003 14:34 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA11824 for <policy-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3MEkZx10588 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:46:35 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3MEgZ810387; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:42:37 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3MEcf809989 for <policy@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:38:41 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA11507 for <policy@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:26:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 197ylV-00026c-00 for policy@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:28:57 -0400
Received: from auemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.223.163] helo=auemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 197ylU-00026Z-00 for policy@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:28:56 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by auemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id h3MESmC20309 for <policy@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2R19XAHF>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:28:48 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155016A3608@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: ned.freed@mrochek.com, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Cc: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>, policy@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16 .txt]
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:28:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: policy-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: policy-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Thanks fro your elaboration Ned. Now that you repeat it, I do indeed recall that you expect to raise a discuss. The draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema is referenced in a normative manner from the policy schema document, that is why it came up on the policy WG list, and that is why I hope we can find a solution soon. (Policy doc has been in RFC-Editor queue fro many months already). Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: ned.freed@mrochek.com [mailto:ned.freed@mrochek.com] > Sent: dinsdag 22 april 2003 15:56 > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Cc: Kurt D. Zeilenga; policy@ietf.org; Ned Freed (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: > draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16 .txt] > > > > As I stated a week (or two) ago, I am working this in the IESG. > > > Kurt, your document has NOT yet been approved. WE're working on it. > > If you go to the ballow page (which you can do from the > view details) > > then you will see that there is one D (Defer), namely Ned Freed. > > He asked for extra time to review... and he will do so before > > May 1st. At that time (I hope) the doc can pass, unless NED finds > > something serious. > > There seems to be some confusion here. > > First, the document I have a defer on is > draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema, > not draft-ietf-policy-core-schema. The latter is in the RFC Editor > queue. > > Second, I thought I made it clear on the call that there was > little chance my > defer would turn into anything other than a discuss. > > The problem I have with this document is that it reuses a > number of attributes > from a variety of other specifications that are themselves > not well specified. > And these specification issues are causing operational > problems. I don't think > it is appropriate to let the specification proceed without > addressing these > issues. I'm trying to find and fix as many of these as I can > and I'm trying to > tap additional experienced people within Sun to review this as well. > > Ned > _______________________________________________ Policy mailing list Policy@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
- RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: draft-ietf-polic… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: draft-ietf-polic… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Fwd: Re: [Policy] Approved: draft-ietf-polic… ned.freed