mailrev BOF

[Chris Newman <[e-mail]>]

Here is a BOF which should interest participants on this mailing list.
The pop3 extensions proposal and POP3 SASL revision are on the agenda for
brief review and a sense of rough concensus.

----
Review of Short Mail-related Extension Proposals (mailrev)

Thursday, August 27 at 0900-1130
================================

Chair: Chris Newman <[e-mail]>
Timekeeper: volunteer needed who is willing to cut people off
Note Taker: volunteer needed

DESCRIPTION:

Thare are a number of short mail-related individual submissions which
appear not to require the review of a full working group, but would
benefit from some review and a sense of rough concensus.  Each draft
on the agenda will be allocated a fixed (and enforced) time limit for a
brief presentation and technical debate.  At the end of the time
limit, the rough concensus of the room will be measured to see if the
draft in question should go standards track expediously, standards
track with revisions, experimental, punt to WG, defer or discourage.

The success of this effort is likely to depend on the number of
participants who read the drafts in advance.  Most of these drafts are
short.  Draft authors are requested to prepare one overhead
transparency to summarize their proposals.  Some of the drafts listed
below could get IESG approval prior to the BOF, in which case they
will be dropped from the agenda.  The purpose of including drafts in
last call on the list is that if they're not approved by the time the
BOF occurs, then the BOF may give review feedback to ADs which could
help speed approval.

Gzip tar file of documents on agenda:
   <http://www.innosoft.com/iii/persons/chris/mailrev.tgz>

AGENDA:

      Time Limit   Presenter  Pages    Draft Title
intro     5   Chair
review    8   Gunnar Lindburg  21  draft-lindberg-anti-spam-mta-04.txt!
concensus 2   Chair
review   10   Randy Gellens    14  draft-gellens-submit-11.txt!
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   John Myers       6   draft-myers-sasl-pop3-05.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Randy Gellens    17  draft-gellens-pop3ext-07.txt!
concensus 2   Chair
review    8   Jacob Palme      14? draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-13.txt!
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Chris Newman     6   draft-newman-msgheader-originfo-05.txt!
concensus 2   Chair
review    8   Jacob Palme      16? draft-ietf-drums-MHRegistry-03.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    8   Randy Gellens    8   draft-gellens-on-demand-05.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Ned Freed        7   draft-freed-gatesec-02.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   L. Lundblade     4   draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-01.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    8   Chris Newman     10  draft-newman-auth-resp-00.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Ned Freed        10  draft-newman-deliver-00.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    3   Chris Newman     4   draft-newman-mime-cdisp-metadata-01.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Ned Freed        11  draft-freed-bsmtp-01.txt
concensus 2   Chair
review    5   Randy Gellens    7   draft-gellens-format-00.txt
concensus 2   Chair
conclude  15  Chair    What's missing from mail standards that
                       IETF could do next?

! - document is in last call
? - document lacks page numbers, estimate included