IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [port-srv-reg] Proprietary transport protocols (panoply and parabay-p2p)

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Thu, 01 September 2011 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC21421F92A0 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JA8JFW9dJLnO for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D9C21F926B for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LQV00BGL8SMXFU1@mail-out.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c71ae0000014d0-53-4e600a738ca1
Received: from kencur (kencur.apple.com [17.151.62.38]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id D5.12.05328.47A006E4; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chesh7.apple.com (chesh7.apple.com [17.193.13.47]) by kencur.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LQV009NM8SQJP60@kencur.apple.com> for port-srv-reg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CA83D0CF.217ED%pearl.liang@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:50:48 -0700
Message-id: <F05C4B61-6C5D-4856-B660-AB1F94C06797@apple.com>
References: <CA83D0CF.217ED%pearl.liang@icann.org>
To: Pearl Liang <pearl.liang@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OTbeEK8HP4MJDHouub0IOjB5Llvxk CmCM4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MpY8M+hYCtPxZJHq5kbGD9ydjFycEgImEi8Ws7TxcgJZIpJXLi3 ng3EFhJoZ5KYtZERxOYVEJT4MfkeC0g5s4C8xMHzsiBhZgEtie+PWoHCXEDlK5gkbiy8wQqS EBYIl5j1/C0ziM0GVPTi8xWwmZwCxhJHv+8Dq2ERUJV4MOMKE8QgY4lPf08yQeyykfi/ag0T xA1GEid23gKzRQTUJW6vXsoEcbKsRNOyjAmMArOQXDcL4bpZSK5bwMi8ilGwKDUnsdLQRC+x oCAnVS85P3cTIyjcGgpNdjAe/Ml/iFGAg1GJh/fnkng/IdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8E1kS/IR4 UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInzembE+QkJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoYPSeVH0uQapjj 4/t9p3rGsqKpy+bvnDRbdmna1h++z9rkHyz7+0kh6/OeP2nJX/4Yvks5+cY629ZPhyFfr/76 f5doMwdd9ttKfOzxQY96hM6mZYn1Hy75NmOl9iTTGwwZC2Y/aU1U2R506+/EB6Gh1lE922ae 9Mp999Xrxf6at0o3dFzqbrhzKLEUZyQaajEXFScCAE4EUQwzAgAA
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] Proprietary transport protocols (panoply and parabay-p2p)
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:49:18 -0000

On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:43, Pearl Liang wrote:

> Hello Stuart,
> 
> I've updated parabay-p2p to tcp.
> 
> Question for 'panoply'.  We have both tcp and udp for panoply.  Should we
> remove the udp entry?  Or we leave it for now?
> 
> Thank you,
> ~pearl

According to the original registration requests, both should be recorded as TCP-only.

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Vishnu Varadaraj <vishnuv@gmail.com>
> Date: 25 January 2010 18:55:33 PST
> To: srv_type_request@dns-sd.org
> Subject: Addition of protocol : parabay-p2p
> 
> Please register the following protocol:
> 
> Short name: parabay-p2p
> Descriptive name: Parabay P2P protocol.
> Name: Vishnu Varadaraj
> Email: vishnuv@parabay.com
> Protocol is proprietary.
> Primary Transport Protocol: _tcp
> Defined TXT keys: None

Begin forwarded message:

> From: natarajan balasundara <nbalasundara@gmail.com>
> Date: 19 April 2010 15:02:16 PDT
> To: srv_type_request@dns-sd.org
> Subject: Addition of protocol: panoply
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to add a protocol 'panoply'.
> 
> Here are the details:
> 
> ---
> 1. Short name of protocol: panoply
> 2. Descriptive name of protocol: Panoply multimedia composite transfer protocol
> 3. Name and email address of responsible person: rajan@ipanoramii.com
> 4. Primary transport protocol: _tcp
> 5. List of defined TXT record keys: none
> --
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> Natarajan Balasundara
> (rajan@ipanoramii.com)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email