Re: [port-srv-reg] AUTH48 iana-ports

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 26 August 2011 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B997721F8C64 for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8za1COAwfACs for <port-srv-reg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5122F21F8C63 for <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.28.165.166] (166-205-138-228.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.138.228] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7QJHZP0027857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CA7D1E53.34BE1%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA7D1E53.34BE1%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <E286CEF9-49AE-4D54-8EB1-228EBA1C4A52@isi.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1)
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:17:30 -0700
To: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" <port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] AUTH48 iana-ports
X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry <port-srv-reg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/port-srv-reg>
List-Post: <mailto:port-srv-reg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg>, <mailto:port-srv-reg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:17:31 -0000

The 4 at the and of the section, including xmp. 

Joe

On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org> wrote:

> Which conflicts?
> 
> --Michelle
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/26/11 7:14 AM, "Lars Eggert" <lars.eggert@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
>> It should be in IANA state, not in AUTH48. IANA wanted to resolve the
>> conflicts, not the authors.
>> 
>> On 2011-8-26, at 16:52, David Harrington wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> This document has now been in AUTH48 for 148 days.
>>> I think the conflict resolution can continue AFTER publication.
>>> Is there any reason why we MUST delay publication of the document at
>>> this point?
>>> 
>>> David Harrington
>>> Director, IETF Transport Area
>>> ietfdbh@comcast.net (preferred for ietf)
>>> dbharrington@huaweisymantec.com
>>> +1 603 828 1401 (cell)
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Port-srv-reg mailing list
>>> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg