Re: [Ppm] Scheduling Poll for PPM Interim Meeting

Samuel Weiler <weiler@csail.mit.edu> Thu, 04 April 2024 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@csail.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ppm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D871BC14F5FB for <ppm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yY8F4fnswikU for <ppm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [147.160.157.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415FCC14F616 for <ppm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sam-2022-14 (c-24-91-7-20.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.7.20]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09D968E2D6 for <ppm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:26:22 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@csail.mit.edu>
To: "ppm@ietf.org" <ppm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR15MB437986111A6D463FA7652FFCB33F2@MW4PR15MB4379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <7f71a845-8109-9bc5-fe4f-003d2fd3fd9b@csail.mit.edu>
References: <MW4PR15MB437986111A6D463FA7652FFCB33F2@MW4PR15MB4379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-81520563-1712247983=:46413"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppm/pk_cGDR8JhZmzfg0ql31ZZBLnVU>
Subject: Re: [Ppm] Scheduling Poll for PPM Interim Meeting
X-BeenThere: ppm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Preserving Measurement technologies <ppm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppm>, <mailto:ppm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ppm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppm>, <mailto:ppm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 16:26:23 -0000

This poll will close tomorrow (sometime).  At the moment, Monday, 
April 22 looks like the winning date.

As earlier in the thread, scroll right in the poll to see more 
proposed time options.

-- Sam


On Mon, 1 Apr 2024, Ben Schwartz wrote:

> As previously discussed [1], we are planning an interim meeting for PPM in lieu of
> our session at IETF 119 (Brisbane).  All PPM participants are encouraged to fill
> out this scheduling poll by Friday, April 5th, to help us choose the time that
> works best for everyone: https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/b4WgXYna
> 
> If you would like to participate and none of these times are convenient for you,
> please notify the chairs, giving specific suggestions.
> 
> Please also send agenda time requests to the ppm-chairs@ietf.org.  We expect to
> spend the bulk of the session discussing the status of the Heavy Hitters problem
> in DAP, but we will also discuss other topics if time permits.
> 
> Thank you,
> Ben Schwartz, for the chairs
> 
> [1]  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppm/zlcIJnrVTNCEq-Cp4g3TOE8jMZc/
> 
> 
>