Re: [Pppext] Advancing PPP RFCs to Standard, updating Security

James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E4B11E80E8 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATrLfP5h5Y37 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlson.workingcode.com [75.150.68.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B803511E80E6 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.50.25.120] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6FC5KMS000236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <51E3E580.7000304@workingcode.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:05:20 -0400
From: James Carlson <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pppext@ietf.org
References: <CAF4+nEFseyZrSivPZ_N-DZVv4uMpeRHiu3iofzgaXpnq3OXe2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEHFJwfzRqa8=g3s1FcqvUeBXhgCZcsd7Hw7n5bt6CkEow@mail.gmail.com> <51B4428A.8070009@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B4428A.8070009@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: carlson; whitelist
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Advancing PPP RFCs to Standard, updating Security
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:05:30 -0000

On 06/09/13 04:53, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> But the WG mailing list isn't online any more.  So any newer
> implementation would likely have troubles.  That's probably more
> important than merely updating document status.  Is there any chance
> to get the old UCDavis and Merit archives back online?

My archived copies of the UCDavis and Merit ietf-ppp archives (January
1990 through October 2004) is here:

http://www.workingcode.com/ppp-archives/
ftp://ftp.workingcode.com/pub/ppp-archives/

We switched to the ietf.org servers in February 2004, so those last few
months aren't too helpful.

The ftp server is smart enough to make archives, so if you fetch
"ppp-archives.tar.gz" or "ppp-archives.tar.bz2", it'll do the right thing.

As a bonus, it includes May through October 1993 of the ppp-comp list.
I don't know if more of those exist somewhere else.

The IETF archives seem to overlap some of this history and (of course)
include the bits since 2004:

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/ietf/

I haven't looked into it to try to figure out why the file sizes are so
different.  I don't know where the pre-2004 files in the IETF archives
came from, but mine were downloaded from Merit before they shut the
servers down.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@workingcode.com>