Re: [ppsp] Fw: Please review the updated Tracker protocol

"zhangyunfei" <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72F21F85A8 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.019, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LP1D4iaOFq3E for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmhqproxy1.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CF321F8573 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmhqproxy1.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4107EE4B4; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:24:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by cmhqproxy1.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30475E4AF; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:24:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.2.0.234]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2011092816244945-13636 ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:24:49 +0800
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:24:45 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: "ppsp@ietf.org" <ppsp@ietf.org>
References: <002101cc7cb6$8125c510$83714f30$@com>, <201109281137454586463@chinamobile.com>, <201109281507130628902@chinamobile.com> <201109281610263435379@chinamobile.com>
Message-ID: <201109281624452876707@chinamobile.com>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 2, 103, 20 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-09-28 16:24:49, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2011-09-28 16:24:50, Serialize complete at 2011-09-28 16:24:50
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon478273603558_====="
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-18412.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--27.241-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--27.241-7.0-31-10;No--27.241-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Fw: Please review the updated Tracker protocol
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:22:06 -0000

Hi,
    Forwarding the comments to tracker protocol draft.


Yunfei






发件人: 张剑寅
发送时间: 2011-09-28 15:07:12
收件人: Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
抄送: ppsp
主题: Re: Fw: [ppsp] Please review the updated Tracker protocol

Hi, Yingjie,

I have some comments on the XML expression as follows:

section 5.1.1
It's ok that one example is presented to show the format of the shared mesage body. But it seems as the content emeded in the message body, having no relation with the "Common Message XML Header", so my advice is to modify the figure title.

section 5.1.2.1
The example for the peerlist representation is not the formal XML format. It can be expressed as follows:
      <Peers>
          <Peer1>
              <PeerID> 48482345122344 </PeerID>
              <PeerAdd> 193.2.2.4 </PeerAdd> 
          </Peer1>
          ... ...
      </Peers>

section 5.1.4.2
The example shown for the FIND response message is just XML schema, rather than message instance. So maybe the figure title should be changed to "XML schema expression for FIND Response message". The same problem exists in the following figures from Figure 6 to Figure 11.

Welcome for more discussion.
  


张剑寅(Jianyin Zhang) 
中国移动通信研究院/Research Institute of China Mobile
Address:宣武区宣武门西大街28号大成广场2门11层1107室(100053)
E-mail: zhangjianyin@chinamobile.com;marcozjy@gmail.com
Mobile:+86-139-1002-2506
Fax:+86-10-63601087

2011-09-28 




发件人: Yingjie Gu(yingjie)
发送时间: 2011-09-27 09:39:58
收件人: ppsp@ietf.org
抄送: 
主题: [ppsp] Please review the updated Tracker protocol

Hi all,
We have uploaded a new version of Tracker protocol. You can find it under PPSP documents webpage, or http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol-05.txt
In this version, we make many changes according to the meeting minutes. 
First of all, we optimize the message definiti on, make optional. We provide more flexibility to implementation, which can help to decrease rounds of message communication and increase efficiency. An example flow is provided, together with example encoding.
Secondly, we update syntax. At last meeting, Wes raised that it was not valid http-xml based encoding. We make large amount of revision to the encoding to make it look better. Hope you can help us to improve it.
 
There will be a virtual interim meeting at this Wednesday. Please try to review it before the meeting if convenient. 
Thanks a lot.
 



Best Regards
Gu Yingjie