Re: [ppsp] IETF93 Prague meeting

"yunfei" <> Mon, 13 July 2015 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293541B2B93 for <>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.801
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHIwgWuulB2j for <>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CC601B2B8B for <>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO[]) by with SMTP 13 Jul 2015 23:12:45 +0800 (CST)
X-SMAIL-MID: 9416011294608
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 80) id EFA2C2F0001; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:12:44 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:12:44 +0800
Received: from[]) by via HTTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:12:44 +0800 (CST)
From: yunfei <>
To: ppsp <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MessageID: 55a3d56c256d153e
X-Originating-IP: []
X-Mailer: Sina WebMail 4.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-sinamail_alt_092930946552597c32bcaad363bba326"
Message-Id: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ppsp] IETF93 Prague meeting
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:12:55 -0000

Hi Dave and all,
    Pls see inline.
[ppsp] IETF93 Prague meeting
Dave Cottlehuber <> Thu, 09 July 2015 11:39 UTCShow header 


Hi all,

I don't think there is an official session for PPSP this time in Prague,
please correct me if I am wrong.

- is there anything further the WG needs to do, or are we ready to
conclude now?
[yf]Although the WG doesn't plan to have offical activities in IETF meetings, it may be a good ideathat the interested people discuss, deploy and update PPSP specs. We don't rule out the possibility of re-setting related works in IETF if there are ENOUGH effort on that.
- are there any people going to IETF93 that would be interested in a
casual meetup if there is no official session?

I am particularly interested in discussing how we can turn PPSP into a
deployed & widely used protocol.
[yf] That's a good proposal. I am regretful that I cannot attend this IETF and join the discussion. Pls, ifpossible, share the discussion points in the mailing list.
NB due to my 3rd child arriving end of May, I am very constrained with
travel and will likely only attend 1 or 2 days.
[yf] Congratualations!
Dave Cottlehuber