[ppsp] comments for gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol and gu-ppsp-peer-protocol
li.lichun1@zte.com.cn Mon, 04 July 2011 06:11 UTC
Return-Path: <li.lichun1@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F12321F850E for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1W3AJHA0hV1u for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530F421F84F5 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 4864790912505; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:03:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 86255.790912505; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:11:45 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p646BfOp052997 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:11:41 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from li.lichun1@zte.com.cn)
To: ppsp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: E0FDEB39:F7D132EB-482578BF:0034E276; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFE0FDEB39.F7D132EB-ON482578BF.0034E276-482578C3.00221512@zte.com.cn>
From: li.lichun1@zte.com.cn
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:11:42 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-07-04 14:11:43, Serialize complete at 2011-07-04 14:11:43
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0022150E482578C3_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p646BfOp052997
Subject: [ppsp] comments for gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol and gu-ppsp-peer-protocol
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:11:58 -0000
Comments for draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol-04. 1. Section 6 "To protect signaling from impersonation attackers, who pretend to be another peer rather than their authentic identities, certificates along with TLS/DTLS could be used to ensure that each message is sent from an authorized participant (tracker or peer) of the P2P streaming system." HTTP is based on TCP. I think only TLS is applicable. 2. The example of peer list is not given. Comments for draft-gu-ppsp-peer-protocol-02. 1. Is it better to add <DestPeerID> in messages? 2. "3.1. Protocol Architecture The proposed PPSP Peer Protocol uses a newly defined, light weight gossip protocol between the peers to exchange the actual information, but uses the RELOAD [I-D.ietf-p2psip-base] protocol to establish the connections between peers and to locate other peers with which to establish gossip protocol connections." Tracker protocol draft and peer protocol draft should consider not-implementing-NAT-traversal instead of RELOAD as default. Implementing and using RELOAD is not neccesary if there is no NAT or the ratio of NATed peer is very low. RELOAD is not the only way to establish connection to NATed peers. Otherthan RELOAD, there is another way (PPSP-ICE), which is proposed in my NAT traversal draft. Using RELOAD or PPSP-ICE brings more work to implementing a P2P streaming system. BR Lichun -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
- [ppsp] comments for gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol and … li.lichun1
- Re: [ppsp] comments for gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol … Yingjie Gu(yingjie)