Re: [ppsp] Question on PPSP IOP and implementation
현욱 <whyun@etri.re.kr> Fri, 05 June 2015 07:36 UTC
Return-Path: <whyun@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5410A1B2D18 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPkqb3joqq56 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpeg.etri.re.kr (smtpeg2.etri.re.kr [129.254.27.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74F31B2D12 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SMTP1.etri.info (129.254.28.71) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:36:06 +0900
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info ([169.254.2.83]) by SMTP1.etri.info ([10.2.6.30]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:36:00 +0900
From: 현욱 <whyun@etri.re.kr>
To: Arno Bakker <arno@cs.vu.nl>, 김성혜 <shkim@etri.re.kr>, "ppsp@ietf.org" <ppsp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ppsp] Question on PPSP IOP and implementation
Thread-Index: AdCfNGi8hlPj69iuSKCgGwvFihc+cP//qtaA//9R5IA=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:35:59 +0000
Message-ID: <3547C9BBE62E844093C527F2EE9D9E3A1DE3C1AA@SMTP2.etri.info>
References: <609FE8B8E7BD1248A27BD3B8BC699ABD1D7424A9@SMTP2.etri.info> <87DA90A8-464C-43D7-A7F9-A6E066CBB3FA@cs.vu.nl>
In-Reply-To: <87DA90A8-464C-43D7-A7F9-A6E066CBB3FA@cs.vu.nl>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.254.164.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3547C9BBE62E844093C527F2EE9D9E3A1DE3C1AASMTP2etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ppsp/VKaZ2U-CpnhJfzpVv9VM5J-dIgY>
Subject: Re: [ppsp] Question on PPSP IOP and implementation
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 07:36:08 -0000
Hi, Thank you for your information. Did you have IOP test with swirl project? Does libswift support PPSP-TP? I think it is necessary to fetch peer list of a specific swarm using tracker protocol to do interoperability test. It would be helpful to list up known implementations in the PPSP WG page, if possible. Thank you. Regards,.. W.Hyun From: ppsp [mailto:ppsp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Arno Bakker Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 3:03 PM To: 김성혜; ppsp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ppsp] Question on PPSP IOP and implementation Hi The libswift implementation is up-to-date. Only PEX_REScert not implemented. CU, Arno On June 5, 2015 4:07:44 AM CEST, "김성혜" <shkim@etri.re.kr<mailto:shkim@etri.re.kr>> wrote: Hi All, We are planning to develop PPSP including both of TP and PP. Some of the solutions (open source) we’ve found are libswift(https://github.com/libswift/libswift) and Swirl(http://www.swirl-project.org/). I seems libswift is implemented on draft version 00. Is this still valid? Are there any other PPSP implementations? Does this WG have any plan for IOP test for PPSP? Regards, Sung