Re: [ppsp] FWI

Is there any such WebRTC-implementation to try? Seems like the most
convenient choice.

David
 On Mar 7, 2014 3:55 PM, "Victor Grishchenko" <victor.grishchenko@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Actually, given WebRTC in the browser, UDP is not needed that much.
> PPSP can be run over WebRTC, just use larger bins (64KB or so). Except
> for LEDBAT, maybe.
> But you'll have to keep the tab open to seed, that's uncool.
>
> On 7 March 2014 18:44, Johan Pouwelse <peer2peer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > A plug-in is required for Chrome.
> >
> > Only "Chrome Apps" have access to the UDP API it seems:
> > http://developer.chrome.com/apps/app_network
> > For Firefox, is this also "plug-in only"?
> >   -j
> >
> > On 5 March 2014 12:30, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@skunkwerks.at> wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> I have been following these tickets/features with interest for a while;
> >>
> >> firefox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952927
> >> chrome: http://developer.chrome.com/apps/sockets_udp
> >>
> >> also,
> http://thenextweb.com/google/2013/06/27/google-adds-its-udp-replacement-quic-network-protocol-to-latest-chrome-build/is intriguing. Keep an eye on it in
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!forum/proto-quic
> >>
> >> A+
> >> --
> >> Dave Cottlehuber
> >> Sent from my PDP11
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ppsp mailing list
> >> ppsp@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ppsp mailing list
> > ppsp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp
>
>
>
> --
> Victor
>
> _______________________________________________
> ppsp mailing list
> ppsp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp
>

Re: [ppsp] FWI - raw UDP socket access in browsers