[ppsp] Update of the tracker protocol proposal?

Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu> Wed, 30 November 2011 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6119521F8B63 for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:49:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.63 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.969, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMxxXe+BkMqt for <ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDBF21F8B5C for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A48828000082 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:49:12 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JFRGFc6XvQf for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:49:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (Methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F01528000080 for <ppsp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:49:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Polydeuces.office.hd ([169.254.3.40]) by METHONE.office.hd ([192.168.24.54]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:49:07 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
To: "ppsp@ietf.org" <ppsp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update of the tracker protocol proposal?
Thread-Index: AcyvdqIKUcpFEddZSjOa7dXMb/tWMQ==
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:49:06 +0000
Message-ID: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F024E92337@Polydeuces.office.hd>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [ppsp] Update of the tracker protocol proposal?
X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol <ppsp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp>
List-Post: <mailto:ppsp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp>, <mailto:ppsp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:49:14 -0000

[Writing as co-chair]
Hi,

There have been a number of concerns about the tracker protocol in draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol. Those concerns have been expressed during the meeting in Taipei and also on the mailing list. 

Is there any plan to address these issues on the mailing list or in an update of the draft?

It would be good to get an updated version of the draft with full-fledged semantics and a more enhanced syntax in mid of December. 

Thank you

  Martin 

martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014