[Pqc] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-hsm-constrained-10: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-hsm-constrained-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-hsm-constrained/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you very much for addressing my discuss, and for incorporating Ionut's
review comments.

These are left here for historical purposes - they have been addressed.....
Section 1, second set of bullet points:  I would soften the Falcon bullet a
bit.  It may not require floating point arithmetic by the time it gets
published.  Perhaps make 'though current specifications require the use' to
'though work is ongoing to possibly reduce the reliance on', and then 'which
may make it' to 'which would make it less'.  Or something along those lines.

Section 7.1, para 2:  This is exactly how I would say this.