[Pqc] Re: [Ext] Re: Pqc Digest, Vol 25, Issue 18

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 26 July 2024 01:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: pqc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pqc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D84C1CAF28; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QU-ZhbeoaT1v; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861F9C1D61FA; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.5]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 46Q1LGqx013056 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:21:17 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:28:49 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:28:49 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Stiepan Aurélien Kovac <stiepan=40mailfence.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Pqc] Re: Pqc Digest, Vol 25, Issue 18
Thread-Index: AQHa3jD5VP+Ni9d4KEe2mY4Q0com/LIHmnOAgADSD4CAAAMCgIAAOw0AgAAEuQA=
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:28:49 +0000
Message-ID: <7609FA79-47AE-4DA1-9A73-51D7265B77FC@icann.org>
References: <172186859424.6614.10512948599530021505@ietfa.amsl.com> <e11b2544-6f02-4a0b-89fe-865996414b30@mailfence.com> <CAMjbhoVkJqP9_WOBSVEBc_Gje7R+=ZaN3k26F=_J=553bFL8sA@mail.gmail.com> <b4a38658-ce6e-47b6-a35d-b0a31a1772fa@mailfence.com> <CAMjbhoUq1eDzNWbw3YZFoUfKt4+HP2UmtNm1zxXesqpSJN30ow@mail.gmail.com> <264624257.402149.1721956314467@ichabod.co-bxl>
In-Reply-To: <264624257.402149.1721956314467@ichabod.co-bxl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4991CCBEA53D5B4FA2A298BAD7654E66@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-07-25_27,2024-07-25_03,2024-05-17_01
Message-ID-Hash: RIVRC5QDVV6MTNTINI5CUHOX25GBPSXB
X-Message-ID-Hash: RIVRC5QDVV6MTNTINI5CUHOX25GBPSXB
X-MailFrom: paul.hoffman@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "pqc@ietf.org" <pqc@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pqc] Re: [Ext] Re: Pqc Digest, Vol 25, Issue 18
List-Id: Post Quantum Cryptography discussion list <pqc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pqc/s9ZWXs_B7hGUvIq-lZGnu41ELvc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pqc>
List-Help: <mailto:pqc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pqc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pqc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pqc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pqc-leave@ietf.org>

On Jul 25, 2024, at 18:11, Stiepan Aurélien Kovac <stiepan=40mailfence.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Following its own logic, NIST should have McEliece as the main option and Kyber as the alternative, versus the other way around.

This discussion would be much more appropriate on the NIST mailing list, not in this IETF WG.

--Paul Hoffman