Re: [precis] Precis Java Implementation

Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com> Mon, 21 December 2015 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sam@samwhited.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FEA1ACDFF for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCojStVU1Ibr for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AB381ACE07 for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n135so23203753qka.2 for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samwhited.com; s=swgoo; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gn3KF4K5E4lXIVP/ZiMUk9rMT27bWBzZcQM3dkk+WOk=; b=x316gMpaww04BTPw3iRwQMG5aAk94LOEi3ehaRQ3G77FFY1KG8YVuNb3+y4hnKYazZ wDhRuvFqJh6kZCkg/C+CedvYAGp/Ga8NkqcD7q1W8cCPk1324/lqfZ/jnKHrfOd/fg8b 5DBljZiV4sCGXZWf92p3PwKKjS8gOQMRwNdNY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gn3KF4K5E4lXIVP/ZiMUk9rMT27bWBzZcQM3dkk+WOk=; b=AC6NG06b5ARf3MSKFjpV0VsddfzfvV4Bz/uCF2SNorpPP94Ay6H6ThK2GMZEAjZ3Et xogRYewq4QmCY+Kxd6zRx/JW1QunRJhcJtPDQf3LVAPH0dz3wwsTXVoHXP4vxMkmDfJS r4aDgklvrhQd+ofdFuDqtBeTxoQfRy7bARHmWyloZRn6DcCc45VwkQCxcvaL5CLD8HEg x4HVxGJRO7Fvv4DotLUzThFq4BDkuQIJeLAQQ+MoRgiYzN80yLRI/Vu/446hwPpwcKWi Vb0STiXT95H5RZOkclLW463RYEAR1N8aXijjfqU/hI3IgUrLlh3YDYSja4waMokLBQde /RbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFq8+8u529w4s8aDuW1Zi3+qFPdK5RU//Vcos5JhyVX86vYzKPS+xTLJy8AHAfXDmFkNwVz7SEZ5eYm4gzPrf0HG6qjA==
X-Received: by 10.55.78.70 with SMTP id c67mr28013356qkb.37.1450737169497; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.10.133 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:32:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [72.48.156.244]
In-Reply-To: <AB5B9D1E-2DA6-4BC5-AAED-A8FDA4E4D66B@thefsb.org>
References: <3012FFC8-1FAD-4C30-8D85-175F4180BC02@gmx.de> <AB5B9D1E-2DA6-4BC5-AAED-A8FDA4E4D66B@thefsb.org>
From: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:32:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHbk4R+nhb2AF+M9zAwTA0S_b1-HWUjV+6koqSrwusbsRHj5hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/Ei8CU0EHj1_yeduJSuZBWCVTYx4>
Cc: peter@andyet.com, precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Precis Java Implementation
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:32:58 -0000

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org> wrote:
> To what extent do you think we could combine our efforts on unit tests?
> Standard (or at least shared) test vectors would really help, given how hard
> it is for programers to decode the RFC texts.

I'd love to help with this; I was considering writing and submitting a
suite of test vectors anyways and would love to have buy-in and
interoperability with other implementations.

Best,
Sam

-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
https://blog.samwhited.com