Re: [precis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-08.txt> (Stringprep Revision and PRECIS Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 09 October 2012 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D525121F8587; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G45-gB4oJBt9; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078A721F853E; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q99KSPEV018461; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1349814512; bh=gk4POarhZqMgri8OaaE5niIm6KZtNsah0VPVgkB1grc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=igMorl0HugmFHzRZiPSAz93Sw37hm+vgLuCrX3GxrgVzjiHjv8Ogz+N0wvXxDs+RH MTRhWi7ULWd0cmrTrbtYJCwhks8j53yUQzDDpebFjZ5tBN8YJquBe2hDR4+yPXbL0A A8LrWb+c7shEU8RpP6qpLqiY8ahc58nxin0DSzFc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1349814512; i=@resistor.net; bh=gk4POarhZqMgri8OaaE5niIm6KZtNsah0VPVgkB1grc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=3/VnMiNXJoZYwge2pIbqxiNRhW/FnhkLnppwK5ZVFNmhRiVYICFe9KJKBT08cxFLJ 0v5oYV3iuQoAh96HqcMpA3JZLpDEBMHi45cnnPennLkOJ47QW6cCZBVchhoaqgJYnj ctGKdMxsPEeEffWxVGs0LFVMvx+9AhR5B94QmtRc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121009103254.0ac57808@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:16:03 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <50745001.9080308@stpeter.im>
References: <20121009134458.18784.49285.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121009070956.0ac31c90@resistor.net> <50745001.9080308@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [precis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-08.txt> (Stringprep Revision and PRECIS Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:28:42 -0000
Hi Peter, At 09:25 09-10-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >At the least, spelling out these acronyms on first use would be >helpful (e.g., "Unicode Normalization Form KC"). Yes. >Indeed, that appendix consists of notes copied from a wiki page that >the PRECIS WG used to collect the information. Ok. >follows the recommendations from RFC 4690. If you are going to >maintain that the PRECIS WG has taken on an intractable problem, then >I think you're also arguing that the IDNABIS WG took on an intractable >problem and that IDNA2008 failed to provide a viable solution to the >shortcomings of IDNA2003 and the Nameprep profile of Stringprep. My view is that the IDNABIS took on a difficult and politically-sensitive problem. There's an open source implementation of the specification . IDNABIS had the advantage of being related to domain names. I'll take back the comment as you did a good write-up. :-) Regards, -sm