IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [precis] [kitten] Fwd: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-04.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 15 October 2013 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE70D1F0D5C; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQYWyo3p--Tu; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991881F0D57; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AEA341019; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:45:43 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <525D7DCC.6020609@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:39:24 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
References: <51FEEC99.1020901@stpeter.im> <52090F96.30700@stpeter.im> <522E5CAA.5010902@stpeter.im> <CAK3OfOifNHzyCC=Acy7ZUykTJ7bU4ecH0iJw8VkhyOpSOrk+hQ@mail.gmail.com> <5230B3B3.3040805@babelmonkeys.de> <87zjr2pmhs.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <tslk3i68fsa.fsf@mit.edu> <87txharmne.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <tslbo3i54rw.fsf@mit.edu> <20130924231746.73c578b7@latte.josefsson.org> <524EB8B4.2000509@isode.com> <525C339A.20407@stpeter.im> <CAK3OfOiqAY900qP5b-BLv6HN=9COh+NXYuVtVznKcKReFw_Nbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOiqAY900qP5b-BLv6HN=9COh+NXYuVtVznKcKReFw_Nbg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "precis@ietf.org" <precis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [precis] [kitten] Fwd: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:39:36 -0000

On 10/15/13 11:16 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
> I'm OK with this.  I would add that if a mechanism allows the "last
> possible moment" to always be on the server side then the choice of
> whether to case fold can be left to the deployer.  Also, mechanisms
> that have enough round trips can always leave this to the deployer as
> well. 

True. I'll try to formulate some text along those lines.

> Even mechanisms that don't -- one could always indicate this
> via DNS, but I won't go there.

Agreed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email