[Privacy-pass] Seeking Review for Privacy Pass Documents

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Mon, 14 September 2020 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4263A0AE8 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtA5y19P83FJ for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935BE3A0AD7 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id f11so264688qvw.3 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KQ7I5zOcluTtax+P0BrJYXJbGMlTfBVfYt4vYXDP/DA=; b=tBGPXKNv191YVpJent1tViOPV/UodNrlnpVhMMPQ/aUVoyWf6F/AwOYQeXKptOq7Aj 4LoCPE3m4SytrMjWN5IFYnSqMyDg4wqFkr8R/lMyj2y01LG3eWuNeaPCoK5dhigPe/et HCAiayR6QBM5T363OvDF+SkCGD0N/bRrlbZxZnZWSFEyOnpUOdw+C/AJDYp/zyWeapr8 ib6eq7q86SAem7Pr+lpwO/+rAPUxi3x+RNKx+Upm+krgTyOrkpe0cjgoc6wRh6sJRQTr dQ2pRPbFWCizT9cjS2ax3KqEVUDyw/+snIhIwH6ja8sP9PqlZ5qFZYK6L2IfWw1ffA2j /ihw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KQ7I5zOcluTtax+P0BrJYXJbGMlTfBVfYt4vYXDP/DA=; b=LsyMy1ENxd7TCVwAQCdOTjYeimyEuo5Bsjp4gPC7fsO/ocY+HbUDe7D4iQNhwCJwR1 CKGyqURikRrauQcAXe0FyOxq8q8uyae7xyZlQZRxKnpCHlu4H5/k3m2deRLxdVmXFXcR CSlmOw1EtRrC8FUSSaBp8Vu4k5DzhYFUtwirws3YBMPuLGbSA0gwjHjpylxzn5SVY+5B umqfjXGwW/LvtshDHXwelEnxnCKsQ9KkWP5bW7ApYtaUDkZis/tD78BWWQxdbAmWRZFp U9I/U54ZjpmDsy/k9v6LgLRsMq2BbguIm4VsZ5l94hDCPNF3n8qmQV8hjGzx/m80toCu Rm9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oEp4MX5BTIH5yzPZIRwRmYgfl9a8PUdkcLM07bYNujO/N/+K/ VDNsk73fyMiG+3gryDKVHNGa3d3cBC7EQe1d8FuzcOizF8tH/Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwinKbTDMTT+14GXJ6qzk6sS+zeLOuedxcS6XleRIz+ODFfStceRlS2G+qG61wjEr5HZcjgLzLgH3N8C/oVw8g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1706:: with SMTP id db6mr14766866qvb.50.1600108249394; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:30:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoCN3WA7CCgWmhVV-bzu_GB9D9aiKXAvHZ5Dy=-vGahtow@mail.gmail.com>
To: privacy-pass@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cec3b605af4a3b6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/KKbJAxHyfLoQ4rRCpnvD6EMY6S8>
Subject: [Privacy-pass] Seeking Review for Privacy Pass Documents
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:30:52 -0000

Hi Folks,

We had a call for adoption for the working group drafts, but we received
very little response and almost no review comments.  Having independent
review of documents is an essential part of producing good quality
specifications.  To further that goal the working group chairs are
seeking additional independent reviews of the candidate working group
drafts.  Ideally, reviewers would have an interest in implementing the
specifications, and reflect a range of relevant specialties, but all
reviews are welcome.  We'll continue to solicit input throughout the draft
lifecycle, but reviews at this stage are important for getting started in
the right direction.

If you are willing to step forward to be a reviewer for the drafts please
let the chairs know, or simply post your comments to the list.  If you know
someone else who would be a good reviewer please let them know of this
work.   The chairs are happy to contact folks to ask for their help in
reviewing.

Thanks,

Ben and Joe