[Privacy-pass] Weekly github digest (Privacy Pass Working Group summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 26 February 2023 08:26 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42E1C14EB12 for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:26:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.695
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="Adw+UOV4"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="iyzfx7Um"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThLchXDoTGEj for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6430C151AE3 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0457332008C3 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:37:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:37:07 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to :sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1677397026; x= 1677483426; bh=Rs31lJzAvxKv4xREOqvmR7Rz233fhsMmWD6+DW8iA6c=; b=A dw+UOV4cY6bsJjOtuGDC8YI7M5FVsRipbHAENI8aEwEzOlzMU/WaDdp4+WMdQwBM r1Zt/MiqfPMW33OHINh0z6EvZ4GIrVkKFwYos/lP9ZwBUDhMKwZNN5MSlfGuqpjr e/BviiuYz6ke2UEW4UDRNLHKfDKpSPoxJ2OyREshs2I02SgX6aqxy8bBWSuNfAJF lUkH/WZZXvQTGby+nMBVJs53SiOOZt5oOZ6JrfqEJgZY6cjLXYm0EEK81PggfLRA EiRfgiEDhg4xfaxhyWteidegmKekuvi2qYuaiOvLKAXEBaOj3fnRVsLO/LH2jKq+ Su5uBQhcE1oSNR3oKLKzA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1677397026; x=1677483426; bh=R s31lJzAvxKv4xREOqvmR7Rz233fhsMmWD6+DW8iA6c=; b=iyzfx7UmvF9xg4HVQ u/en1gfUEn8pnKQAcyiN5bO5xeEr31v8l+42ZLtrs//zITQeJX+YoeooD1bpVPyD 7OG7GnW9zV23Iomk+AMW+c7GFcTNw6ZfZ7hzoIeN2M0hHpAbU42VYI0DaA3PcKrs rPRTIXXVbxksXfjxwfKmuXmprUE5lRpJMoYPJDqOGt4Rilu8bwbDWkwLbmY798w4 A607iImdsGy+Um4amC/5YZMy81SYRt8fP4Jo7SVZvbN9wvBTGsPynd9XbF4J/uXk RISScLrU3qQsivfHIP+gRh7JxrvuYNuI+hoUxM6/7ymxjqPXoRVLz0paX/C0DTOC RQGeQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Igz7Y5t5SYEctTy3C2eVfOhWMzAKpeqE29i4J14WYGnEC9iiMph-Bw> <xme:Igz7YyclZNxbxMkf8xcn2rK2rvXmBeLNxTHS0CqstwPaw-qKFiENW1oDHcMwcTYDA MXUdG7xGBA0pGmOYA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Igz7Y8wzWdl2UGcVCuhnEuis70QR7PucpTPYDFllvVR69421cQCw-q_GCnHMZE6jk2n3gAyJ8FkF2C8dQ4WMTn5t3qL_cc3Dgbr36QWGNJmuS2H2CeUuzQZBI9IXE8bfyww>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudekjedguddthecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Igz7YwPCd5wZ1m0Dise6Fi3VW-15NhnDffjJCSDaKse8NttvDqMYfg> <xmx:Igz7Y58RVOj6iSH7zwRPMGdH6gb6Ss-abDT870b5KuuSph3psblxRA> <xmx:Igz7YwX3GhWidafETZO3LZ-_apSQjJpxpB9hX7gOs2yrw-Fx1J9y-g> <xmx:Igz7Y-I1Y6NXw5_0zKYJHU-HhL9q4DU4FEr6FExIeLYGc3xudb-rLA>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:37:06 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0495015445126917297=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: privacy-pass@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20230226082604.A6430C151AE3@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:26:04 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/MWOsdqCID6hUZJdz4-2fbwqMIMI>
Subject: [Privacy-pass] Weekly github digest (Privacy Pass Working Group summary)
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Pass Protocol <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 08:26:09 -0000
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts (+0/-0/💬4)
3 issues received 4 new comments:
- #332 Can the Origin distinguish per- and cross-origin tokens? (2 by chris-wood, martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/issues/332
- #330 Diagrams (1 by martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/issues/330
- #323 Does the architecture need to use HTTP? (1 by martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/issues/323
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts (+11/-2/💬0)
11 pull requests submitted:
- Attester partitioning considerations (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/345
- Fix the diagrams (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/344
- More clear context descriptions (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/343
- Explicit trust relationships (and privacy considerations) (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/342
- Token caching security considerations (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/341
- Fix copy-pasta error in issuance context definition (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/340
- Discuss what happens to tokens in circulation after compromise (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/339
- Converge on "attestation procedure" (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/338
- Attestation is a prerequisite for issuance (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/337
- Not specific to HTTP (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/336
- Move the IAL on step 6 to the step and not the list (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/335
2 pull requests merged:
- Move the IAL on step 6 to the step and not the list
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/335
- CIRCL was out of date
https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts/pull/318
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/base-drafts
- [Privacy-pass] Weekly github digest (Privacy Pass… Repository Activity Summary Bot