(Repost) 51st IETF - Provisioning Registry Protocol WG (provreg)
Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl> Fri, 27 July 2001 12:33 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) with ESMTP id f6RCXKBe007223 for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:33:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) id f6RCXK4X007222 for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:33:20 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from bartok.sidn.nl (bartok.sidn.nl [193.176.144.164]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta13/8.12.0.Beta13) with ESMTP id f6RCXJBe007217 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:33:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from bartok.sidn.nl (localhost.sidn.nl [127.0.0.1]) by bartok.sidn.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6RCXEk02067 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:33:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jaap@bartok.sidn.nl)
Message-Id: <200107271233.f6RCXEk02067@bartok.sidn.nl>
To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: (Repost) 51st IETF - Provisioning Registry Protocol WG (provreg)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:33:14 +0200
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
I noticed a lot of complaints from he listserver about unknown adresses, just after this was posted to the list. Just to make sure that this actually went out, I decided to repost it. jaap Provisioning Registry Protocol WG (provreg) Wednesday, August 08 at 1530-1730 ================================== Hilton Rooms 1-6 (Multicast Room) CHAIRS: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl> Ed Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com> AGENDA: The usual: bashing (the agenda) & document/wg status.........15 minutes Selection of minute taker (http://www.ietf.org/instructions/minutes.html) Requirements document status, comments from IESG The missing documents (e.g., mapping of EPP to BEEP) OPP draft, comparison w/EPP and GRRP (James).................25 minutes http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jseng-provreg-opp-00.txt Discussion: How does this fit into WG plans? Should this be admitted to the group? Discussion on Data Collection Requirements (Scott)...........20 minutes http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-grrp-reqs-02.txt http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-07/msg00002.html Discussion: a clarification of requirements generated by a dilemma in protocol design. EPP drafts, outside deadlines................................20 minutes http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-04.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-*-02.txt (See http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/provreg-charter.html) XRP draft, comparison w/EPP and GRRP (Eric)..................25 minutes http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brunner-xrp-00.txt Discussion: How does this fit into WG plans? Should this be admitted to the group? Implementaion-to-date commentary (?).........................15 minutes Discussion: comments are sought on the state of implementations of the proposals. (Volunteers sought.) ============ 2 hours Other Items that may creep into the agenda (but haven't been allotted time yet: The Definitions document http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-dn-defn-01.txt Discussion: originally thought to accompany the requirements, but now having a separate document seems like overkill. This may slip into document status (unless the author wishes to speak). Report from RIR's on provreg I've asked for the RIR viewpoint on Provreg matters, but didn't give the contact person much advance warning. Hopefully we can hear from that group - if they have time to prepare. If we do have a report, 5 minutes could be knocked off the OPP and XRP items (as they are the longest). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial. Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
- (Repost) 51st IETF - Provisioning Registry Protoc… Jaap Akkerhuis