IETF Logo Mail Archive

[provreg] Escrow, DNRD rdeDomain:trDate vs. rdeDomain:trnData

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> Sat, 11 April 2015 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6C81B30D4 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QM60dTEBVzO for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD13C1B30D3 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so35745845lbb.2 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vAqiDrFvr9L0LvtWDTrRLS183HQ3Dfp0f2Ozu6WDCFM=; b=HSoMO0kp/HRIYRbBB0RayWNwC05Dcm1fvlZrb3tDKh/FVMMmGJ8bAG4k1jy6/H9fTU Y1s2wWOzy7WmrNfbxAq5xfUjHZNeyMMrZ0JAfb+E779fQeYwSSGF81i1I5fJcXuOT+xR /4i94sqOPPyH+cla6UQB5/WOy/NEngRqdOchQKp0ETNmaBgXbQgXT8RYnMJVKzRHseM/ nLyqo1EDx3PP5BExgwkYTm3do/NyRbbokjuiew/BGXU4QDAFituW9G1So7K3F4X1QJnL wOOLwYu7KGirjkyse+VNOxlV7+k+7Vh75qD8TCkOBLTYAXZru/dMe9j2l1f/81yqIsha 58Dg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.219.2 with SMTP id pk2mr6955548lac.107.1428793299245; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.45.3 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 01:01:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC1BbcTqa+1q0RLGZJTUG9mqM+2P_9jma8=oT_6ha6QzxnQqkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/Op5hKJdEqRJlj_wJ6YGRCd7ThsY>
Cc: noguchi@jprs.co.jp
Subject: [provreg] Escrow, DNRD rdeDomain:trDate vs. rdeDomain:trnData
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:01:42 -0000

Hi,

I have a FIXME in my code to implement trDate in rdeDomain, i.e. the
Domain Escrow data.

It seems the dnrd-objects-mapping-05 still specifies rdeDomain:trDate
but the changelog of registry-data-escrow-06 seems to mention that
rdeDomain:trDate was replaced by rdeDomain:trnData.
Who's right? I suggest to fix this by removing the redundant
rdeDomain:trDate from the DNRD as per the changelog in the RDE draft.

thanks,
Long version below.

Now i (still) cannot find the official RFCs that describe either
Registry Data Escrow
or
DNRD Objects mapping

So let's assume that the now expired drafts still are the base of the
escrow schema.
AFAICS the latest versions currently are:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arias-noguchi-registry-data-escrow-06
resp.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping-05

(please correct me if i'm wrong).

The RDE-06 draft 11.2.7 and 11.2.8 suggest that trDate of domains and
contacts were removed.
Yet, the DNRD-05 does mention trDate for domain, host and contact
(didn't look at the CSV parts)

I am not affected by host-transfers, but if the trDate of domains and
contacts is removed (in favour of the trnData) then the same should be
done for hosts, too.

Please fix.
TIA,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email