Re: Additional Response Code and Status Code for EPP

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Fri, 08 March 2002 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.3.Beta0/8.12.3.Beta0) with ESMTP id g28D2Jni023704 for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:02:19 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.3.Beta0/8.12.3.Beta0/Submit) id g28D2JaY023703 for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:02:19 +0100 (MET)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from nic-naa.net (dt0b4n7d.maine.rr.com [24.95.12.125]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.3.Beta0/8.12.3.Beta0) with ESMTP id g28D2Ini023698 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:02:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g28I0BW23128; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:00:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Message-Id: <200203081800.g28I0BW23128@nic-naa.net>
To: "Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>
cc: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: Re: Additional Response Code and Status Code for EPP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2002 15:03:55 CST." <23309E398D84D5119D0F00306E07513901181B18@dc02.npac.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 13:00:11 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk

This seems appropos, from the Portland Pattern Repository (de facto home
of the extreme programming discipline), hosted by Cunningham & Cunningham.

	"Life's too short to write code that nobody wants."

I'm not going to put conditional in my implementation, either there exists
a right-to-publish (register) or there exists a right-to-retract (modify).

Conditional completions (keywords: speculation,lottery,lazy evaluation)
are for those who have the requirment. It isn't general, and shouldn't
be in EPP.

Eric