[ietf-provreg] Re: document management

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Fri, 17 January 2003 22:27 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA06303 for <provreg-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:27:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0HMLI9p001923 for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:21:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h0HMLI5o001922 for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:21:18 +0100 (MET)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from nic-naa.net (216-220-241-233.midmaine.com [216.220.241.233]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0HMLH9p001917 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:21:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0HMLgZ2021203; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:21:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Message-Id: <200301172221.h0HMLgZ2021203@nic-naa.net>
To: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, jaap@sidn.nl, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: [ietf-provreg] Re: document management
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2003 10:55:37 EST." <a05111b06ba434aafbd3c@[192.149.252.226]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:21:42 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk

> Some background reading:
> 
> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00099.html

I see Jaap's note 2) "Other transports".

Noting the lack of interest I'll modify the conditional boilerplate in
draft-brunner-epp-smtp-00.txt that anticipated adoption of the memo by
a working group, track dependencies in the set of WG memos, and continue
off-list.

> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2002-12/msg00092.html

No comment required.

> In the last, item #5 lists the three issues of which I'm aware.

2. Come to a final understanding of UDP and EPP.

I'm still not convinced by PAF, or Scott Bradner, but its the opinion of
the other implementors, if any, that is controlling.

3. Clarify the adoption of P3P concepts.

I seem to have missed both the problem statement and the solution.

5. An SMTP mapping is all but dead in the water.

See above.

Eric