IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-provreg] References for Today's Host Object Discussion

Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org> Thu, 10 April 2003 21:38 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA07729 for <provreg-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:38:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 193jUD-0004dT-00 for provreg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:21:33 -0400
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 193jUC-0004dQ-00 for provreg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:21:33 -0400
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3ALQSRN026022 for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:26:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3ALQSTh026021 for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:26:28 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from buffoon.automagic.org (buffoon.automagic.org [208.185.30.208]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3ALQMRN026015 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:26:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 96652 invoked by uid 0); 10 Apr 2003 21:26:17 -0000
Received: from localhost.automagic.org (HELO isc.org) (root@127.0.0.1) by localhost.automagic.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 21:26:17 -0000
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:26:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] References for Today's Host Object Discussion
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
To: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <a05111b06babb8d682bd7@[192.149.252.108]>
Message-Id: <0FF71998-6B9B-11D7-A6F5-00039312C852@isc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thursday, Apr 10, 2003, at 17:17 Canada/Eastern, Edward Lewis wrote:

> Would excluding MX's (et.al.) be too shortsighted for our 
> extensibility (E of EPP)?

If we can add them using extensions, I would say that is plenty of 
support.

> Would only considering NS's and glue be sufficient for EPP 1.0?

I would say yes.

[My previous comment was really just a clarification of what it was I 
was talking about, and not any kind of opinion that RRs other than NS 
and glue should be supported in the base set of documents.]


Joe

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status