[proxies] next steps for draft-hoeper-proxythreat-01.txt

Klaas Wierenga <klaas@wierenga.net> Mon, 09 March 2009 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <klaas@wierenga.net>
X-Original-To: proxies@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: proxies@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F9F3A6B85 for <proxies@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYEsK4tcMEz7 for <proxies@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A1E3A68C8 for <proxies@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,328,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="263813614"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2009 10:43:59 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com []) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n29Ahwq4012018 for <proxies@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:43:58 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com []) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n29AhwmB004662 for <proxies@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:43:58 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com ([]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:43:58 +0100
Received: from ams-kwiereng-8715.cisco.com ([]) by xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:43:57 +0100
Message-Id: <1FEB1A7C-E6A8-479C-921C-5EFEC50C44F7@wierenga.net>
From: Klaas Wierenga <klaas@wierenga.net>
To: proxies@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <49216718.6070905@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:43:56 +0100
References: <> <> <BLU137-W54E3AB48E6D604B591851E931F0@phx.gbl> <491D92DF.6020100@restena.lu> <491EBDA2.4060209@wierenga.net> <BLU137-W184088AF25C88B75E1D78593110@phx.gbl> <49216718.6070905@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2009 10:43:57.0586 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3203F20:01C9A0A3]
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=klaas@wierenga.net; dkim=neutral
Subject: [proxies] next steps for draft-hoeper-proxythreat-01.txt
X-BeenThere: proxies@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for ad hoc group interested in security and proxies <proxies.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proxies>, <mailto:proxies-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/proxies>
List-Post: <mailto:proxies@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proxies-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proxies>, <mailto:proxies-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:43:30 -0000


It has been very quiet at the proxies list.... how about we do a  
survey of existing roaming consortia (Boingo, iPass, eduroam, FON,  
mobile operators etc.) and see how they have dealt with the threats  
identified in the proxythreat draft? I think that would be a  
worthwhile exercise both to validate proxythreat and to get a current  
practices overview that hopefully will lead to a best current  
practices document.

I had a look at the documents produced in ROAMOPS (RFC 2194, 2477, )  
but they are a bit outdated....