Re: [proxies] New Version Notification for draft-hoeper-proxythreat-02

Klaas Wierenga <> Tue, 10 March 2009 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45813A6D05 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3txnLm516iVF for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:610:508:110:192:87:110:29]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB05C3A6D03 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([] helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1LgzB0-000HBX-Uo; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:27:11 +0100
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:27:10 +0100
From: Klaas Wierenga <>
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefan Winter <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: no malware found
Subject: Re: [proxies] New Version Notification for draft-hoeper-proxythreat-02
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for ad hoc group interested in security and proxies <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:26:42 -0000

Hi Stefan, Karin,

>> A new version of the proxy draft has been posted and is available at
>> The new version attempts to address most comments that have been
>> previously posted to this list and some of the discussions at IETF 73.
>> One major difference is that the new draft describes current practices
>> that mitigate some of the identified threats by proxies.
> Thanks for your efforts! Interestingly, the stub sections about eduroam
> et al. in your draft coincides nicely with Klaas' wish about describing
> existing deployments. Of course there is still text missing for those
> stubs. As soon as my time permits, I will flesh out the eduroam parts.
> Input from others and their current problem mitigation approaches is
> most welcome!

I am happy to contribute

>> I won't be able to continue as an editor and Stefan Winter agreed to act
>> as the new editor of the draft. Stefan will also replace me as the
>> moderator of the proxy email list. Thank you Stefan!
> Thank you for getting the draft up to this point.

yes, thanks for the effort, not only in writing the draft but also in
getting the proxy group to move forward!

>> Please read the new draft and provide your comments or even better
>> provide some text to Stefan and become a co-author. Much work remains to
>> be done and volunteers are needed, especially if the draft should be
>> formed into a "best practices" document.