Re: [PWE3] Fibre Channel Drafts - Last Call

Black_David@emc.com Tue, 28 April 2009 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A733A6BCE for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dN1J6m-v0OyO for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E663A6B11 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id n3S0X3pK013422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:33:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (numailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.16]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (Tablus Interceptor) for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:32:55 -0400
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.3.2) with ESMTP id n3S0WnSu007092 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:32:55 -0400
Received: from CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com ([10.254.89.201]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:32:50 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:32:49 -0400
Message-ID: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02890437@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: Fibre Channel Drafts - Last Call
Thread-Index: AckCNDNITbqJL0uJRV+TYel42k3kjwFkTD3gL/TBfQA=
To: pwe3@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2009 00:32:50.0361 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC693A90:01C9C798]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Fibre Channel Drafts - Last Call
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:31:47 -0000

With the split of the FC PW into two drafts, the changes
below apply to Section 3 of draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-flow-00.txt .
They still need to be made.

Thanks,
--David

-----Original Message-----
From: Black, David 
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:35 PM
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Cc: Black, David; 'Moran Roth'
Subject: FW: [PWE3] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-08.txt

The draft was posted this time.  I've diff'ed this draft against the
-07 version.  The results look good; I have a few minor edits to the
new timing material in Section 7:

OLD:
   while the device is unable to forward these Primitive Sequence due to

   backpressure indication, it shall flush its respective buffer (PSN-
   facing if the Primitive Sequences were received from the CE, CE-
   facing if they were received from the remote PE), and shall forward 
   the Primitive Sequences. 
    
NEW: (change "shall" to "MUST") 
   while the device is unable to forward these Primitive Sequence due to

   backpressure indication, it MUST flush its respective buffer (PSN-
   facing if the Primitive Sequences were received from the CE, CE-
   facing if they were received from the remote PE), and MUST forward 
   the Primitive Sequences. 

OLD:
   Another case is when there is no specific backpressure indication, 
   rather Primitive Sequences are being delayed due to retransmission of

   dropped frames. In this case also, the PE shall flush its PSN-facing 
   buffer and shall forward the Primitive Sequences.

NEW: (clarify paragraph, add retransmission sentence, add explanation
	of why R_T_TOV is important)
   Another case is when there is no specific backpressure indication, 
   but the Primitive Sequences cannot be immediately forwarded
   due to frames awaiting retransmission that must be sent first.
   In this case, the PE MUST flush its PSN-facing buffer and MUST
   forward the Primitive Sequences.  Long sequences of the same
   Primitive Sequence MUST be suppressed as described in [FC-BB].

   If the buffer clearing actions described in the previous paragraphs
   fail to ensure that the round trip latency for Primitive Sequences
   is less than R_T_TOV, the Fibre Channel link that is carried by the
   pseudowire may fail or may go offline and remain in that state
   because an R_T_TOV timeout in used in Fibre Channel's Link
   Initialization,  Link Failure and Link Reset protocols (see
   Section 7 of [FC-FS]).  Therefore, the FC PW SHOULD NOT be used
   when the latency across the FC PW may exceed 0.5 * R_T_TOV.

OLD:
   To guarantee correct operation of this mechanism FC PW SHOULD NOT be 
   used in environments where the RTT may have high variability, i.e., 
   environments where the estimated RTT may not be off by more than 5% 
   of MIN(E_D_TOV,R_A_TOV).
NEW:
   To guarantee correct operation of this mechanism FC PW SHOULD NOT be 
   used in environments where the RTT may have high variability, i.e., 
   environments where the estimated RTT may be off by more than 5% 
   of MIN(E_D_TOV,R_A_TOV).                ^   
                                           |
Remove "not" ------------------------------/

I think this is ready to go with these changes - if we treat the last
one as a thinko, they're all editorial and could be dealt with at IETF
Last Call.

Thanks,
--David

-----Original Message-----
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:45 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-08.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge
Working Group of the IETF.


	Title           : Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre
Channel frames Over MPLS Networks
	Author(s)       : M. Roth, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-08.txt
	Pages           : 40
	Date            : 2008-08-19

A Fibre Channel pseudowire (PW) is used to carry Fibre Channel frames 
over an MPLS network. This enables service providers to offer 
"emulated" Fibre Channel services over existing MPLS networks. This 
document specifies the encapsulation of Fibre Channel PDUs within a 
pseudowire. It also specifies the procedures for using a PW to 
provide a Fibre Channel service.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-08.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.