[PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-07.txt> (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 21 September 2011 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B7711E8089; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P4ZIfRJGJMqm; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806811E8073; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.60
Message-ID: <20110921140759.17643.8107.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:07:59 -0700
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-07.txt> (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:07:59 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document: - 'Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires' <draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-10-05. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies a mechanism to signal Pseudowire (PW) status messages using an PW associated channel (ACh). Such a mechanism is suitable for use where no PW dynamic control plane exits, known as static PWs, or where a Terminating Provider Edge (T-PE) needs to send a PW status message directly to a far end T-PE. The mechanism allows PW OAM message mapping and PW redundancy to operate on static PWs. This document also updates rfc5885 in the case when BFD is used to convey PW status signaling information. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.