IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] [mpls] Response to Liaison on Clarifying P2MP Combinations

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 26 November 2013 04:16 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12161AE10F; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:16:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bjrxnXaG_9RW; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1B51ADFC6; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [112.208.29.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3C2C1802038; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:16:47 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <529420AD.5080405@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:16:45 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
References: <CEB45EA6.580D2%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> <5290BEFC.20308@gmail.com> <5292A5F7.3010609@pi.nu> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6329A3272@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6329A3272@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] Response to Liaison on Clarifying P2MP Combinations
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:16:53 -0000

<snip>
> 2) use of a P2MP PW in conjunction with one or more P2P LSPs is definitely not
>       valid.
>
snip>

Well a MS-PW could do P2MP over P2P LSPs, right?

/Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status